News

Mitchell Silverstein is an attorney based in Miami and Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, with 15 years of experience specializing in complex litigation, corporate governance, and legal ethics.

A graduate of Pepperdine Caruso School of Law, Mitchell has built a reputation as a strategic, ethically focused lawyer and advisor who guides his clients through challenging legal landscapes while maintaining integrity at the core of his practice. After beginning his career in private practice, Mitchell transitioned into an in-house counsel role, where he now collaborates with businesses to craft proactive legal strategies. His dedication to ethical corporate governance and public policy reform, along with his commitment to pro bono work, reflect his mission to use the law as a tool for positive impact.

What initially drew you to practice law in Miami, and how has the city influenced your approach?

Miami’s dynamic and diverse business environment was a huge draw for me. This city isn’t just a hub for tourism—it’s also a major player in international trade, finance, and real estate, which means there’s a unique complexity to the cases here. The multicultural nature of Miami has shaped my approach to law by broadening my perspective on client needs and the importance of cultural sensitivity in legal practice. The diversity here reminds me that every client brings a different set of values and priorities, and it’s my job to consider these nuances when crafting strategies. Miami is also a place where reputation and relationships matter deeply, so upholding ethical standards isn’t just about avoiding legal repercussions; it’s about building lasting trust.

How has your transition from private practice to in-house counsel changed the way you approach corporate governance and legal strategy?

The transition from private practice to in-house counsel has fundamentally changed my approach, especially regarding corporate governance. In private practice, my role was more reactive—clients would bring specific issues to me, and I’d focus on resolving them. But as in-house counsel, my role is to be proactive, anticipating potential legal and ethical issues before they arise. I work closely with executives, HR, and compliance teams to make sure the entire company operates with a solid ethical framework. This shift has helped me see governance as a continuous process of improving policies, ensuring compliance, and fostering a culture of accountability. As in-house counsel, I’m responsible for shaping the bigger picture rather than just focusing on individual cases, and that broader view has made me appreciate the long-term impact of good governance.

What does ethical legal practice mean to you, especially in Miami’s high-stakes corporate world?

To me, ethical legal practice is about more than just following the law—it’s about doing what’s right for the client and for the community. In Miami’s corporate scene, where high-stakes decisions are often the norm, the temptation to cut corners or bend rules can be strong. But I believe that integrity must come first. Ethical legal practice means advising clients with honesty, even if it means challenging them on certain practices or strategies. It’s about taking responsibility for the broader impact of legal decisions and ensuring that those decisions align with both the law and the values of the business. When clients know you’re prioritizing their long-term interests over short-term wins, that’s when real trust is built, and it’s something I work hard to maintain.

How do you handle ethical dilemmas when they arise in complex litigation cases?

Ethical dilemmas can certainly arise, especially in complex litigation, where there’s often a lot on the line for both the client and their opponents. When faced with an ethical dilemma, my first step is always to return to the principles of transparency and honesty. I discuss options openly with the client and explain the legal and ethical risks associated with each approach. Sometimes, the best course of action is to take a more conservative approach that prioritizes compliance and ethical considerations, even if it might be more challenging. Litigation can be an intense process, but making decisions with integrity is non-negotiable for me. I’d rather take a principled stand and potentially miss out on a quick win than compromise my ethics and risk damaging my client’s reputation in the long run.

What role do you think public policy reform plays in the evolution of corporate law, especially in a city like Miami?

Public policy reform is essential to ensuring that corporate law keeps pace with societal changes. In a city like Miami, where industries like real estate, finance, and technology are constantly evolving, laws and regulations need to adapt as well. Public policy reform is an opportunity to address the ethical and social issues that businesses encounter and to create frameworks that protect consumers, employees, and the environment. I try to stay engaged in policy discussions, particularly in areas like data privacy and corporate governance, where laws are evolving rapidly. For me, reform isn’t just about imposing more rules; it’s about creating policies that encourage ethical business practices and protect the rights of everyone involved. In Miami’s vibrant economy, public policy reform can create a more level playing field that benefits businesses and the community alike.

What advice would you give to young attorneys starting their careers in complex litigation?

My biggest piece of advice is to approach every case with a mindset of continuous learning. Complex litigation is challenging and multi-layered, and there’s always more to learn—whether it’s new case law, negotiation strategies, or even technology that can streamline discovery. I’d also emphasize the importance of building trust with clients by being honest and clear in your communication. Litigation can be an emotional and financially taxing process for clients, and the best way to support them is by setting realistic expectations and guiding them with integrity. Lastly, I’d tell young attorneys to focus on developing a strong ethical compass from the start. There will be moments when taking the easy path might seem tempting, but if you stay grounded in your values, you’ll build a reputation that lasts.

How do you maintain your own sense of balance and focus in such a demanding legal environment?

Balance in a high-stakes legal environment is essential, and for me, it’s about having a structured routine and setting boundaries. My day typically starts early with a workout, which helps me clear my mind before diving into complex casework. I try to segment my day, setting aside specific times for deep work on cases, meetings, and personal reflection. Taking breaks is key—stepping away, even briefly, allows me to return with a fresh perspective. Maintaining focus also requires discipline with my time. Knowing when to say “no” and prioritizing what truly needs my attention has been essential in managing the demands of my role without burning out. For me, finding balance means making sure I have the energy and clarity to give each client the attention and care they deserve.

What’s the most rewarding part of practicing law for you?

The most rewarding part of practicing law is seeing the positive impact of my work on clients’ lives and businesses. Knowing that I’ve helped a business navigate a complex issue or made a difference in someone’s legal journey gives me a sense of purpose. When I see a client succeed because we chose a path rooted in integrity and ethical practices, that’s when I feel the most fulfilled. Law can be challenging, but when you know that your efforts are contributing to long-term success and positive change, it makes all the hard work worthwhile. For me, it’s about more than just winning cases—it’s about creating lasting, positive outcomes that clients can build on.

Mitchell Silverstein continues to make a mark in Miami’s corporate legal landscape, offering his clients ethical guidance and strategic insight in complex litigation and corporate governance. His dedication to integrity, transparency, and proactive legal strategy sets him apart in the Miami legal community.

Read more:
Legal Excellence in Miami: A Conversation with Mitchell Silverstein Attorney

The British Library and Yuewen have launched a landmark three-year collaboration, Literature in the Digital Age, to enhance cultural exchange between the UK and China and to promote partnerships in creating new cultural IP.

The new collaboration was announced in a launch event at the British Library last night with representatives from the British Library, Yuewen, the China-Britain Business Council (CBBC), along with renowned Yuewen authors and Richard Pooley, Director of the Conan Doyle Estate and step-grandson of Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, to explore and discuss literature in the digital age.

Speaking at the event, Jas Rai, Chief Operating Officer of the British Library, highlighted how “this collaboration with Yuewen will make our collection accessible and relevant to new audiences around the world. We’re excited for what’s to come as this project unfolds and connects literature lovers across continents.”

The highlight of this collaboration is the new inclusion of ten popular online novels by Chinese authors being added to the British Library’s collection, documenting the increasingly popular cultural trend of internet literature in China. Some of the most popular new novels in China are being included such as Lord of Mysteries, a fantasy thriller that has amassed over 86 million views online.

“This is a recognition of not only our writers and their creativity, but also online literature as an emerging cultural force,” noted Yuewen Group CEO Hou Xiaonan. “Just as the popular Sherlock Holmes and Harry Potter grew from literary roots to worldwide fame, we look forward to welcoming the next generation of global stories in online literature. It is an honor to see titles such as Lord of Mysteries now being housed in the British Library alongside the works of Shakespeare and other classics.”

All these works were originally published on Yuewen’s digital platforms. In 2017, Yuewen launched its international platform, WebNovel, now hosting 650,000 original works by 430,000 contributors from around the world. Hou Xiaonan also revealed that in the UK alone, WebNovel has attracted 16,000 contributors and over 6.83 million visitors to date, with annual readership growing by nearly 30%—a testament to the growing cultural impact of internet literature in the UK.

The three-year project includes a programme for Yuewen writers to see some of the most iconic items in Library’s collection, attend creative workshops, and engage in co-creation digital campaigns with readers to blend Yuewen IP with English literature works from the British Library.

Read more:
International online literature comes to life at the British Museum

Ferguson Whisky Limited, a Glasgow-based company specialising in rare whisky investment opportunities, has secured a £450,000 funding package from Virgin Money, backed by UK Export Finance (UKEF).

The funding will support the purchase of whisky stock, enabling the company to expand operations and meet growing international demand.

Founded in 2021 by CEO David Ferguson, the company aims to make the world of rare whisky collecting more accessible. Ferguson Whisky offers a range of services, including investment in new make whisky or aged stock, and provides support through the bottling process. The company has established strong relationships with major Scottish distillers and has partnerships with Brindiamo Group in the US bourbon market and Bravo Whisky Golf in the luxury travel sector. These connections allow Ferguson Whisky to offer rare casks and organize exclusive experiences such as distillery tours and bespoke whisky events.

Virgin Money’s Commercial and Trade Finance teams collaborated with UKEF to structure a deal tailored to Ferguson Whisky’s needs. UKEF supported the bank by issuing a General Export Facility (GEF) loan guarantee, covering 80% of the financing and enabling Virgin Money to complete the transaction. The GEF is a flexible government-supported scheme designed to help UK export businesses, particularly SMEs, access working capital facilities to improve cash flow and accelerate international trade growth.

David Ferguson, Founder and CEO of Ferguson Whisky Limited, said: “We are an independent blender and bottler providing end-to-end whisky services from cask to bottle for customers all over the world. The support from Virgin Money, with backing from UK Export Finance, will ensure that we can continue to accelerate business growth internationally and attract more whisky consumers to visit Scotland.”

Craig Wilson, Head of FX Sales & Trade Finance at Virgin Money, added: “We are delighted to be working with David and his team to support their rapid and successful business growth. Their business needs a bank that can truly support international trading, and we are honored that they selected Virgin Money as their banking partner.”

Carol Harvey, UKEF Export Finance Manager for Scotland, concluded: “This deal is a great example of how UK Export Finance can help support small businesses in Scotland. With the Scottish Whisky Awards being held in Glasgow at the end of this month, I couldn’t think of a more apt opportunity to toast to Ferguson Whisky’s success.”

Read more:
Ferguson Whisky Secures £450,000 Funding from Virgin Money to Expand Global Reach

Virtue Drinks, the UK’s fastest-growing clean energy drink brand, has announced the successful closure of a £2 million investment round.

This latest funding brings the company’s total investment to over £5 million. Notable investors in this round include James Watt, co-founder of BrewDog—Europe’s largest craft beer brand—and Eberechi Eze, Premier League footballer and England international.

James Watt will take on the role of strategic advisor, providing guidance to Virtue’s founder and CEO, Rahi Daneshmand, on scaling the business globally. Eberechi Eze will actively participate in Virtue’s marketing strategy, aiming to amplify the brand’s presence following the investment. They join existing investor Chris Smalling, former England and Manchester United footballer, along with a group of strategic angel investors.

The infusion of capital will support Virtue’s strategic marketing efforts, global distribution expansion, and team growth. The company plans to enhance brand awareness in the UK, Europe, and beyond, capitalizing on its current presence in over 5,000 stores across 20 countries. Key stockists include Waitrose, Whole Foods Market, Ocado, Morrisons, Motor Fuel Group, Casino, Carrefour, and Spinneys.

Founded in 2016, Virtue offers clean energy drinks made with all-natural ingredients, zero sugar, and zero calories. The beverages are powered by yerba mate, an adaptogen rich in essential vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants. Available in three flavours—Tropical, Peach & Raspberry, and Strawberry & Lime—each can contains 80 milligrams of natural caffeine, equivalent to a cup of coffee or traditional energy drink.

Virtue’s products aim to provide a sustained energy boost that enhances mental focus and physical performance without the crash or jitters associated with traditional energy drinks and coffee. The brand is certified carbon neutral and vegan, aligning with growing consumer demand for healthier and more sustainable options.

Rahi Daneshmand, Founder and CEO of Virtue, stated: “We are really excited to partner with Eberechi Eze and James Watt to build the leading clean energy drink brand globally. Their belief in our vision and commitment to our growth emphasises the positive impact we plan to achieve together. As the first all-natural energy drink with zero sugar and zero calories, Virtue is well-positioned to lead the way for clean energy. These partnerships mark the start of an exciting next chapter for Virtue, and we can’t wait for even more people to enjoy our clean energy drinks.”

James Watt added:”It is seldom that I see a drinks brand that genuinely excites me. In Virtue, I found an amazing product led by a brilliant entrepreneur. I am delighted to now be helping them on their growth journey.”

Eberechi Eze concluded: “Virtue is more than just an energy drink to me; it’s a brand I truly believe in. Its clean energy aligns with my lifestyle on and off the pitch. I am excited to be part of a brand that is all about a natural, healthier way to energise.”
With the UK energy drinks market valued at £3.4 billion and expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.20%, Virtue aims to establish clean energy drinks as a major category within the industry.

Read more:
Virtue Drinks Secures £2 Million Investment from BrewDog Co-Founder and England Footballer

Nish Kankiwala, chief executive of the John Lewis Partnership, has accused Chancellor Rachel Reeves of implementing a “two-handed” tax grab on retailers, joining a growing backlash against the recent Budget.

Kankiwala stated that John Lewis faces increased employment costs and higher business rates following the Budget, which could hinder the retailer’s turnaround efforts. “That seems to be sort of [a] two-handed grab, and that’s unhelpful,” he told the Financial Times.

The partnership, which operates John Lewis department stores and Waitrose supermarkets, anticipates spending tens of millions of pounds extra on staff costs after the Chancellor announced an increase in the employers’ National Insurance rate. In the Budget, Ms. Reeves stated that employers’ National Insurance contributions would rise from 13.8% to 15% in April, while also lowering the threshold at which contributions are paid.

Additionally, the Treasury has delayed a planned overhaul of the business rates system until 2026, despite previous pledges to reform how companies are taxed on their properties to support retailers. This delay means that many retailers, including John Lewis, will face higher business rates bills for at least another year.

Kankiwala commented: “If they could delay the National Insurance [changes], but also if they could fundamentally bring forward a radical reshaping of business rates, I think it will make a massive difference—not just for small and medium enterprises, but I think for retail generally. It’s very important.”

The criticism from John Lewis comes after retailers expressed frustration at being blindsided by the changes, having believed that business rates reform would occur sooner. Simon Roberts, chief executive of Sainsbury’s, recently stated that the supermarket supported the government’s employment reforms based on a “clear commitment” from ministers to urgently address business rates. “We need business rates reform in order to balance the scales,” he said.

Amid growing tension between the Treasury and retailers, over 80 chief executives wrote to Ms. Reeves last weekend, warning that the sector faces £7 billion in increased costs, making job losses and price rises inevitable.

Kankiwala said the John Lewis Partnership would attempt to avoid raising prices. “The last thing we need is a resurgence of inflation, because we just got that under control, and inflation is not good for anybody,” he added.

In response, Treasury officials reportedly reached out to retailers last week in an effort to ease concerns after learning that companies were planning a public letter criticizing the Budget decisions. The Prime Minister’s spokesman stated they were not aware of any attempts to discourage businesses from signing a letter, adding: “Obviously you’ve seen vast waves of reaction to the Budget, as you do with all fiscal events, and this is no different.”

The Treasury has defended its decisions, arguing that “difficult choices” were necessary in the Budget. A Treasury spokesperson said earlier this week: “By doing this, more than half of employers will either see a cut or no change in their National Insurance bills. There will be £22.6 billion more for the NHS, and workers’ payslips will be protected from higher tax. This government is committed to delivering economic growth by boosting investment and rebuilding Britain.”

Read more:
John Lewis CEO criticises Rachel Reeves over ‘two-handed’ tax increase

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has reported a significant increase in tax receipts, providing a much-needed boost to the government following criticism over the recent budget.

According to leading audit, tax, and business advisory firm Blick Rothenberg, total tax receipts have grown by £24 billion over the past year compared to the previous 12 months.

Tom Goddard, a Senior Associate at Blick Rothenberg, commented: “The total tax receipts continue to grow year on year after a slight blip in August (where they were just under a billion pounds lower than August 2023) with total tax receipts up £24bn over the last year compared to the 12 months prior. This provides some much-needed financial optimism for the government after a tumultuous budget which had many fearing the worst.”

He added: “The total tax collected over the last 12 months is now over £842 billion and getting closer to the £850 billion mark, which will likely be hit in the next month with December traditionally being a good month for revenues.”

Goddard highlighted that Labour’s commitment to increasing the national living wage will further boost HMRC’s highest revenue stream—income tax. “Those increases, and indeed those from the Employers’ National Insurance contributions, won’t, however, filter through until after April 2025,” he noted.

Despite this, there has already been an approximate 8% year-on-year increase in income tax receipts, surpassing the current 2.3% Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) figure, which itself rose by 0.6% in the last month. “Not only are those wages for the UK’s lowest earners going to continue driving this increased tax taking, but Labour’s affirmation that income tax thresholds and the personal allowance will remain frozen until the 2028/29 tax year will continue to drag more and more people into the higher and upper rate tax bands,” Goddard explained.

He also addressed the recent focus on UK inheritance tax, stating: “This tax brings in a relatively modest amount to the total tax take, with the prior 12 months’ total being just shy of £8bn, which is effectively 0.9% of the total HMRC receipts in the same period.”

Goddard added that it will take time before any proposed changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) impact tax revenues. “Changes in those two reliefs won’t come through until April 2026, and Inheritance Tax itself is only payable until the end of the sixth month after the date of death. So, at best, anyone caught by that is not going to show through until the November 2026 figures are released.”

Read more:
Tax revenues rise £24bn, offering government optimism amid budget backlash

The brewing controversy over mis-sold car loans has forced Santander UK to set aside £295 million to potentially compensate aggrieved motor finance customers.

The bank joins a small but growing list of lenders that have started to make provisions for the growing scandal, which some analysts believe could leave the car loans industry footing a redress bill of as much as £30 billion.

Santander UK’s move takes the total amount earmarked by firms for compensation costs so far to just under £1 billion. This includes £450 million set aside in February by Lloyds Banking Group, a leading player in the vehicle finance market.

Expectations that lenders will be forced to redress borrowers en masse have been growing ever since the Financial Conduct Authority (FCU), the regulator, this year began a wide-ranging review into potentially unfair commissions in motor finance deals.

A landmark Court of Appeal judgment last month has significantly expanded the scope of the potential problem facing the industry, fuelling speculation that banks and the lending arms of car manufacturers face a crisis akin to the £50 billion payment protection insurance scandal.

The court ruling was the trigger for Santander UK’s provision, which was disclosed in its third-quarter figures.

The lender was originally due to publish its results in late October but delayed the release at the last moment to consider the ramifications of the surprise court judgment.

It said on Wednesday that it had decided to set aside money “in light” of the ruling and that £295 million encompassed “estimates for operational and legal costs, including litigation costs, and potential awards”. It cautioned, however, that there were “significant uncertainties as to the extent of any misconduct, if any” and that “the ultimate financial impact could be materially higher or lower than the amount provided”.

Analysts at S&P, the credit rating agency, said the development “illustrates the potential size of affected lenders’ liabilities” over motor finance.

The provision contributed to a sharp fall in Santander UK’s pre-tax profits to £143 million in the three months to the end of September, from £558 million a year earlier.

It is a blow to the bank, which is the British division of Santander, Spain’s biggest lender. Santander UK is one of several lenders that has seen a rise in customer complaints and county court claims over car loans since the FCA banned discretionary commissions in motor finance in early 2021.

Commissions are paid by lenders to car dealers for arranging loans. Some firms used discretionary arrangements, where commissions were tied to the interest borrowers paid on their loans. The authority banned them over concerns that the arrangements encouraged the sale of more expensive credit.

The jump in consumer complaints about these commissions in recent years prompted the watchdog to start an inquiry in January into discretionary arrangements struck as far back as April 2007. The broad scope of the continuing review stoked speculation that lenders might be forced to compensate customers, expectations that have been further fuelled by last month’s court judgment.

The ruling is significant because it applies to all types of motor finance commission, not just discretionary arrangements. The court found that any commission that was not properly disclosed to a borrower, or consented to, was unlawful and it decided that lenders were liable to repay the money to consumers.

This sent shockwaves through the car loans industry because it set a much higher threshold for disclosure and consent than had previously been required by regulation. Several lenders temporarily suspended their motor finance operations while they overhauled their procedures to ensure they were compliant with the ruling, causing chaos in the market.

The industry is now waiting for the Supreme Court to give its view on the matter. Close Brothers and FirstRand, the lenders at the centre of the cases considered by the Court of Appeal, have said that they intend to appeal to the UK’s highest court. The FCA wants the Supreme Court to “decide quickly” whether it will grant permission to appeal.

The crisis gripping the car loans market “exemplifies” problems with the Financial Conduct Authority’s approach to regulation, the head of the motor finance trade body has told peers.

Stephen Haddrill, the director-general of the Finance & Leasing Association, said a Court of Appeal ruling last month on the disclosure of commissions paid by lenders to credit brokers — mainly car dealers — arranging motor finance showed that there “hasn’t been clarity in the regulation about what should be made transparent”.

He told the House of Lords financial services regulation committee: “A lack of certainty is exemplified by what we’ve seen around motor finance in the last few weeks, in particular the inconsistency between the law and regulation.”

In 2019, following a lengthy review by the FCA of the motor finance market, the authority decided against a big overhaul of its disclosure requirements to force firms to be explicit with borrowers about commission amounts. It said at the time that “we doubt whether such changes would result in a significant change in behaviour” and added: “Consumers are unlikely to engage with detailed explanations of complex commission models.”

Yet the court in October ruled that “secret” and partially disclosed commissions in motor finance were unlawful. This mis-match between common law and the FCA’s rules is at the heart of the current turmoil in the car loans market and potentially paves the way for a flood of consumer compensation.

Asked by the committee on Wednesday about “secret” commissions in the industry, Haddrill replied: “Why did the FCA allow it to continue?”

His criticisms echo comments made by Sir Howard Davies, the former chairman of the FCA’s predecessor body, the Financial Services Authority, who told the committee last month: “I am disappointed that there has not been sufficient regulatory clarity on the rulebook, which has meant that the court has been able to step in with its own interpretation.”

A spokesman for the regulator said: “We are aware of the impact that the Court of Appeal judgement has had on firms and the market in general.”

More broadly, the FCA has been criticised by some in the City in recent years over what some consider to be an overzealous approach to regulation. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, used her first Mansion House Speech to City grandees a week ago to argue that rules brought in since the 2007-09 financial crisis had “gone too far”.

Haddrill said there was “a surfeit of complexity” and told peers: “We feel that the regulatory regime at the moment is not conducive to lending”.

Anthony Coombs, the chairman of motor finance company S&U, which has drawn scrutiny from the FCA, also appeared before peers and said: “The FCA is not fit for purpose, at least as far as our sector is concerned. It is oppressive, it is deterring investment in the industry, it is inconsistent, and gradually it is smothering our section of the financial services market.”

Read more:
Santander UK sets aside £295m for car finance scandal

The price of bitcoin soared to a record high of $94,839, extending a rally that has seen its value surge by nearly 40% since Donald Trump’s re-election victory.

The digital currency, worth $7,333 five years ago, has benefited from optimism surrounding a potentially crypto-friendly regulatory environment during Trump’s second term.

Once a sceptic of cryptocurrencies, Trump has pledged to transform the US into “the crypto capital of the planet” and establish a “strategic reserve” of bitcoin. His campaign actively accepted cryptocurrency donations, and he engaged with crypto enthusiasts at a bitcoin conference in July. Trump has also launched World Liberty Financial, a venture with family members focused on cryptocurrency trading.

Trump’s victory has prompted Republicans to invite crypto leaders to Washington for discussions on a new crypto policy framework. Industry executives are hopeful that Trump will deliver on promises to enact legislative and regulatory changes, including his commitment to remove Gary Gensler, the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who has been spearheading the government’s crackdown on cryptocurrencies.

Stéphane Ouellette, CEO of crypto trading firm FRNT Financial, commented: “Trump’s seeming interest to push further into crypto on a personal level has contributed to optimism that crypto will be a top priority when Trump takes office.”

US bitcoin exchange-traded products have also seen a boost, with $4.2 billion in inflows since Trump’s victory—accounting for 15% of total inflows since these products launched on US stock exchanges earlier this year.

Chris Weston, head of research at Australian broker Pepperstone, noted the potential for further growth: “Another kick higher should bring in a fresh chase from those who like to buy what’s strong.”

The crypto community is cautiously optimistic about Trump’s pro-crypto stance, seeing it as an opportunity to solidify the US as a global hub for digital currencies. However, critics warn that bitcoin’s notorious volatility and speculative nature may present risks for both investors and broader economic stability.

Bitcoin, created in 2008 by the mysterious figure Satoshi Nakamoto, has no physical form and was initially worth almost nothing. Over the years, its adoption and popularity have grown, though its price remains highly volatile. With Trump’s endorsement and promises of a supportive policy environment, the cryptocurrency has found fresh momentum.

Read more:
Bitcoin hits record $94,000 as trump vows to make us ‘crypto capital’

The social media advertising space is highly saturated with hundreds and thousands of brands vying to secure greater visibility and maximum conversions.

Facebook allows advertisers to connect with over 2.9 billion active users each month, offering an unmatched lead generation and user engagement potential across social media.

Despite this striking potential, the Meta advertising experience is marred with innumerable ad restrictions that make scaling impossible for most brands. Facebook ad restrictions can prove immensely overwhelming for brands eager to increase their ad spend for higher ROIs and advertising gains.

Switching to Facebook agency accounts becomes a necessity for advertisers managing campaigns for multiple clients without restrictions disrupting their campaign performance. Read on to explore the role of Facebook agency ad accounts in navigating ad restrictions to support streamlined campaign management.

Navigating Facebook Ad Restrictions

Businesses invest in Facebook advertising to achieve broader goals: generating brand awareness and high-quality leads for revenue growth. However, setting up an ad campaign alone isn’t enough to achieve these goals. Meta maintains a strictly regulated and closely monitored advertising space across Facebook and Instagram.

Each ad is diligently reviewed before approval and publishing, and the Meta support team also closely monitors the activities of advertisers using Facebook Advertising accounts. It’s common for ads to get rejected due to copyright infringement or violations of Meta’s advertising guidelines. Once an ad is rejected, the ad account is slammed with multiple restrictions, limiting the advertiser’s ability to create and publish new campaigns.

These restrictions limit ad spend, delay the campaign review process and often prevent advertisers from using certain placements, ad types and tools. Meta maintains that this stringent review and monitoring process is crucial in protecting its advertising space and users from misinformation and poor advertising experiences.

Facebook ad restrictions include:

Daily spending limits that restrict campaign performance and user engagement.
Restrictions on using certain features and tools.
Restrictions on advertising on Facebook and other Meta platforms.

In many cases, advertisers struggle with restrictions while managing campaigns for multiple clients or technical errors that lead to temporary or permanent restrictions. Advertisers navigating these frustrating restrictions must consider upgrading with specialized Facebook agency accounts to unlock unlimited spending and enjoy a restriction-free advertising experience.

Scaling Campaigns with Facebook Agency Accounts

Specialized Facebook agency ad accounts are born out of a privileged relationship between Meta and reputable advertising agencies. Unlike regular accounts, these accounts are equipped with a range of cutting-edge tools and recent algorithm updates to empower advertisers with new technologies and features.

Upgrading with Facebook agency accounts allows marketers to bypass all restrictions and map out an unrestricted scaling pathway to achieve their advertising targets. Planning and managing multiple campaigns becomes easier when the algorithm is designed to optimize ads for higher user engagement and maximum conversions.

Efficient & Effective Campaign Management

Imagine running multiple campaigns for various clients with a regular Facebook ad account that imposes a stringent daily ad spend limit and denies access to various tools. The process is bound to be frustrating because these regular ad accounts aren’t designed to serve agencies and marketers. In contrast, dedicated Facebook agency accounts offer streamlined dashboards and a wealth of automated tools to support effective and efficient campaign management.

Meta is continually updating its algorithm and these Facebook agency accounts are the first to be updated, allowing agencies access to innovative features and practices. This allows advertisers to capture the right audiences at the right time by securing the most impactful ad placements. Marketers can partner with reputable and competent agencies and benefit from their specialized expertise while ensuring their ad spend secures the highest ROIs.

Optimize your Ad Spend to Supercharge Performance

A higher ad spend allows advertisers to run high-performing ad campaigns that secure greater conversions and website visits. While higher spending is not a guaranteed formula for success, it is an integral element to tap into a broader audience. A low ad spend leads to underperforming campaigns with minimal user interaction.

Once you’ve finished your daily ad spend, Meta will stop showing your ads to their intended audience. Facebook agency accounts allow marketers to supercharge campaign performance with a monthly ad spend that exceeds 100M, giving them complete control over their scaling goals. Advertisers can optimize their ad spend based on their underlying goals and campaign plan. Meta’s daily ad spend is a major restriction that doesn’t allow marketers to optimize their ads effectively.

For instance, spending restrictions limit audience selection and prevent marketers from selecting coveted ad placements that ensure higher user engagement. Facebook agency ad accounts come with an unlimited ad spend, offering greater control on data management, audience selection and user engagement.

Advertisers can spend more to create multiple lookalike audiences and tap into new customers to grow their brands.

Bypass Restrictions & Blocking Issues

Being permanently blocked from using a Facebook Advertising account is an advertiser’s worst nightmare, for once you’ve been blocked from the platform, there’s no way to reverse it. Aside from temporary and permanent blocking issues, marketers navigate a wide host of restrictions that restrain creativity and limit their control.

Specialized Facebook agency accounts are designed to bypass all blocking issues and restrictions, empowering marketers with creative independence and greater control. When you partner with a reputable agency, you gain a reliable partner to help you navigate restrictions and unblock your advertising account without having to set up a new account.

Even if ads or campaigns are slammed with restrictions, Facebook agency accounts are equipped with features to eliminate these issues without disrupting campaign performance. Advertisers can relaunch blocked or restricted campaigns within seconds. When dealing with limitations or upcoming updates, marketers can rely on 24/7 agency support to mitigate issues before they disrupt campaign performance.

Final Thoughts

Marketers are accountable for ensuring their client’s advertising investment leads to tangible results, such as revenue growth, new customer acquisition and greater online visibility. Facebook agency accounts support data-driven advertising and offer access to a 1000 data-points algorithm designed to supercharge lead generation and conversions.

Facebook agency ad accounts are the ultimate solution to tap into the full potential of Meta advertising and enjoy a restriction-free pathway to convert maximum leads. Marketers can monitor real-time results while scaling their ad campaigns to connect with consumers worldwide.

Read more:
Navigating Ad Restrictions: The Role of Facebook Agency Accounts in Large-Scale Campaign Management

Museums and galleries are often seen as cultural treasures, places where history, art, and science are preserved for future generations.

However, their value extends far beyond their cultural significance. These institutions have a profound economic impact, driving tourism, creating jobs, and supporting local businesses.

Across the globe, cities and nations are beginning to realize the full potential of investing in cultural assets. Museums and galleries are no longer seen only as cultural symbols; they are economic powerhouses that can transform communities.

Boosting Local Economies

Tourism is the most visible way museums and galleries contribute to the economy. Iconic institutions like the Louvre in Paris or the British Museum in London attract millions of visitors annually. These tourists buy more than entry tickets, they spend money on hotels, restaurants, transport, and shopping. This spending ripples through local economies, benefiting a wide range of businesses.

Museums and other cultural facilities can also be crucial in smaller cities by drawing visitors from the exterior. For example, cities with lesser-known galleries often see increased foot traffic during special exhibitions or exceptional events. Local businesses, from cafés to gift shops, thrive on this influx of people.

Museums are major economic contributors. Running a museum requires a diverse team, from curators and security staff to marketing professionals and maintenance workers. Renovations, exhibit installations, and daily operations also create opportunities for local suppliers and contractors and contribute to a region’s economic dynamism.

Creating Lasting Economic Stability

As said before, the financial benefits of museums and galleries don’t stop at ticket sales. These institutions improve the overall appeal of cities and regions, creating attractiveness for potential residents and companies. A vibrant cultural scene often draws professionals and families looking for a high quality of life. This, in turn, helps local economies by increasing demand for housing, schools, and services. It is also an important source of increase in land value.

The cultural sector is a significant part of the UK’s economy. Art institutions contribute nearly 5% of GDP, according to recent reports. This figure highlights how important these organizations are, not just for their cultural contributions but as pillars of economic stability.

Generating a Positive Social Impact

Museums and galleries also invest in education and outreach programs. These initiatives benefit local communities by offering workshops, lectures, and other diverse activities. Schools often partner with museums to introduce students to art and enhance their educational programs. These collaborations help foster a sense of pride and engagement in the local community.

Cultural outreach also makes regions more appealing to investors. Companies often choose to establish headquarters or offices in cities with vibrant cultural offerings, as they offer a better lifestyle for the employees and their families. This creates a cycle of economic growth, where cultural investments lead to business growth and vice versa.

Qatar: The Modern Example

Qatar is a standout example of how cultural investment can drive economic development. Over the past two decades, the country has strategically developed its cultural sector to diversify its economy.

The National Museum of Qatar, designed by renowned architect Jean Nouvel, is a testament to this vision. Opened in 2019, the museum is more than a cultural landmark; it’s a key part of Qatar’s economic strategy. Indeed, the country relies on a new public image to continue fostering investment in various sectors so that it can thrive without depending on oil.

In addition to individual museums, Qatar has implemented large-scale cultural initiatives like the Years of Culture program. This annual initiative promotes cultural exchange with other nations, fostering international partnerships. Beyond bringing in tourists, scholars, and artists, Years Of Culture is a great occasion to develop solid bonds with foreign countries and extend the diplomatic influence of Qatar.

Qatar’s success shows that cultural investments can yield significant returns, which are not only financial. The country demonstrates how to use culture as a tool for economic growth while strengthening its national identity.

What Lessons for Other Nations ?

Qatar’s approach offers valuable examples for other nations looking to leverage their cultural assets. Investing in museums and galleries can transform economies, particularly in regions that may not traditionally bet on tourism, and create a stronger sense of unity around shared heritages.

Moreover, costly development planning is not always useful, especially when it is possible to start by building or enhancing existing cultural facilities. Developing partnerships with schools, universities, and local businesses can help expand the reach of these organizations to a broader public. Governments can also support cultural programs that engage diverse communities and ensure that museums are accessible to all.

Investing in culture does not come without challenges and risks. Museums require significant funding to maintain operations and develop new exhibits. However, the long-term economic, social, and historical benefits often outweigh these costs.

Final thoughts

Museums are not just about preserving the past, they are investments in the future, which is even more the case with art galleries. They generate revenue, create jobs, and enrich communities. Their impact is felt far beyond their walls, influencing everything from tourism to education and urban development.

As cities and nations are always looking for ways to improve their economic model, cultural investment should be a priority. By funding museums and galleries, governments and businesses can unlock significant economic potential.

Read more:
Are museums and galleries vectors of Economic Growth?